[Previo por Fecha] [Siguiente por Fecha] [Previo por Hilo] [Siguiente por Hilo]

[Hilos de Discusión] [Fecha] [Tema] [Autor]

[Fwd: GCC 2.96] Referente de Red Hat 7 y similares



Esto es importante, no se dejen engañar por las distribuciones que
vienen con números de versión superiores a los que todos sabemos que son
los más recientes.

referencia:
http://www.redhat.com/products/software/linux/rhl7_standard.html

Lo mismo va para el kernel 2.4, la última versión de pruebas es
2.4.0-test9; el que falte poco para el 2.4.0 final _NO_ significa que ya
exista, es _MENTIRA_ de la mercadotecnia barata de esas compañías
chafas.

Si quieren una buena distribución:
1. hagan la suya propia
2. usen otra que no sea Red Hat
3. si tanto les gusta Red Hat (como a mi) usen la  6.2 o la 5.2 o la ppp
6.3 o 6.4
4. si tanto quieren usar Red Hat 7 espérense a la 7.2, las .0 y .1
siempre le salen muy chafas a Red Hat

Lo mismo va para Mandrake

Si tienen dudas sobre los números de versión más recientes vayan a los
sitios oficiales
gcc.gnu.org
www.kernel.org

--
Sandino Araico Sánchez
Talk is cheap. If you want to convince me, do the WORK.
--Linus Torvalds


--- Begin Message ---
It has come to our attention that some GNU/Linux distributions are
currently shipping with ``GCC 2.96''.

We would like to point out that GCC 2.96 is not a formal GCC release nor
will there ever be such a release.  Rather, GCC 2.96 has been the code-
name for our development branch that will eventually become GCC 3.0.

Current snapshots of GCC, and any version labeled 2.96, produce object
files that are not compatible with those produced by either GCC 2.95.2 or
the forthcoming GCC 3.0.  Therefore, programs built with these snapshots
will not be compatible with any official GCC release.  Actually, C and
Fortran code will probably be compatible, but code in other languages,
most notably C++ due to incompatibilities in symbol encoding (``mangling''),
the standard library and the application binary interface (ABI), is likely
to fail in some way.  Static linking against C++ libraries may make a
binary more portable, at the cost of increasing file size and memory use.

To avoid any confusion, we have bumped the version of our current
development branch to GCC 2.97.

Please note that both GCC 2.96 and 2.97 are development versions; we
do not recommend using them for production purposes.  Binaries built
using any version of GCC 2.96 or 2.97 will not be portable to systems
based on one of our regular releases.

If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever supplied the compiler as we can not support 2.96
versions that were not issued by the GCC team.

Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/snapshots.html if you want to use our
latest snapshots.  We suggest you use 2.95.2 if you are uncertain.

The GCC Steering Committee <http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html>



--- End Message ---


[Hilos de Discusión] [Fecha] [Tema] [Autor]