[Previo por Fecha] [Siguiente por Fecha] [Previo por Hilo] [Siguiente por Hilo]
[Hilos de Discusión] [Fecha] [Tema] [Autor]---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 05:55:49 -0900 From: John Totten <john en totten com> Reply-To: caldera-users en rim caldera com To: linux-list en ssc com Cc: suse-linux-e en suse com, caldera-users en rim caldera com Subject: No Linux on Merced This can't be good... http://www.ymmv.com/yesterdaily.html > > UNIX Vendors Commit to 64-Bit Intel Merced Chip, But Linux Locked Out > > UNIX vendors are champing at the bit to develop for Intel's new 64-bit CPU. > But one group is conspicuously absent from the list of developers: authors > of freely distributable OSes such as Linux and FreeBSD. > > Sean Eric Fagan, a developer of the FreeBSD operating system, says that > these increasingly popular UNIX derivatives may be excluded from the race. > "First," says Fagan, "Intel is only releasing information about the Merced > under NDA. This makes it impossible for gcc to be ported to it, and for > free OSes to support it. Second, the Merced will work on 'PC98' computers. > These computers all have I2O support, and information on how to talk to an > I2O board is only available under NDA. So, I do not believe that FreeBSD > or Linux or any other free operating system will be quickly ported to the > Merced, if ever. " > John Totten Sitka Alaska